I eat… most of the time…
Brian: At 130 lbs don’t you just inhale air for sustenance?
![]()
me: LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Brian: At 130 lbs don’t you just inhale air for sustenance?
![]()
me: LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
What is this, Friendster?


For those who want a down to the second countdown… I know I do! ![]()
So apparently Hillary can’t decide on a campaign song so she’s letting the people choose for her. I gotta hand it to her – that a pretty good idea. I found this after reading CNN’s Election Center and I became increasingly interested in each of the candidates positions on various issues.
As with most elections there are “the issues” where most Americans see which candidates align most to their own beliefs. In the past I didn’t really review much and just picked one (although I was sure not to choose the one that was elected anyway, but oh well). This year, I’ve decided to do a little more research in an effort to, not only learn more about what our country’s concerns are, but to make a more educated decision about a vote in which affects me in more ways that just one. So far, I’ve only run across the six issues that CNN’s Election Center posted: Abortion, Immigration, Iraq, Same-Sex Marriage, Social Security, and Taxes. I’m sure there are many more out there, this is just my initial opinion on these six main issues. Also, I’m primarily following the top 5 candidates: Hillary Clinton, John Edwards, Barack Obama, Rudy Giuliani, and John McCain. Seemingly, the rest have too low of a rating for me to give a sh*t. At least for now.
Hopefully I can gain a better understanding of all of this and how it relates to my life and our country over the months leading up to our 2008 election.
I wish to explicitly use the term “opinion” because that is what this is… my opinion. If you disagree, I welcome your intelligent debate; however, please provide something more than just abusive criticism. I know that Politics can be a touchy subject in the GLBT community. I am all for discussing a subject, but not when it turns to an outright quarrel.
Abortion Rights:
Immigration:
Giuliani: Supports providing a path to citizenship for some illegal immigrants, but not ahead of those in the system legally. Says that illegal immigrants must pay back-taxes, penalties, and learn English and American history before gaining citizenship. Supports a high-tech fence at the U.S.-Mexican border. Supports short-term use of the National Guard to help secure the U.S.-Mexican border and long-term increases in border patrol personnel. Supports creating a tamper-resistant ID system to verify legal status.
Iraq:
O’DONNELL: … I just want to say something. 655,000 Iraqi civilians are dead. Who are the terrorists?
HASSELBECK: Who are the terrorists?
O’DONNELL: 655,000 Iraqis — I’m saying you have to look, we invaded –
HASSELBECK: Wait, who are you calling terrorists now? Americans?
O’DONNELL: I’m saying if you were in Iraq, and the other country, the United States, the richest in the world, invaded your country and killed 655,000 of your citizens, what would you call us?
HASSELBECK: Are we killing their citizens or are their people also killing their citizens?
O’DONNELL: We’re invading a sovereign nation, occupying a country against the U.N.
Quite a strong conversation. I do agree with O’Donnell in the aspect that she’s looking at the situation from the other side. What if we were the country where we had lost over 600,000 citizens? I don’t think we’d be looking at the other country in a very favorable light. Perhaps her choice of the word “terrorist” was a bit ill-chosen; but she does have a point. I think that even though the efforts made in Iraq are in response to an attack made on U.S. soil, that they are very much so drawn out way beyond what they should have been and not handled in the best fashion. But then again, look who is running the show.
Same-Sex Marriage:
On his website Alexander Coburn tries to introduce nuance into the discussion of same-sex marriage:
Why rejoice when state and church extend their grip, which is what marriage is all about. Assimilation is not liberation, and the invocation of “equality” as the great attainment of these gay marriages should be challenged. Peter Tatchell, the British gay leader, put it well a couple of years ago: “Equality is a good start, but it is not sufficient. Equality for queers inevitably means equal rights on straight terms, since they are the ones who dominate and determine the existing legal framework. We conform — albeit equally — with their screwed up system. That is not liberation. It is capitulation.”
Oh how I couldn’t agree more. Tax Benefits, Medial, Parenting, Legal… all these are very important to myself. These are rights afforded to any two individuals who believe in entering into a union among the state. It shouldn’t be horded for only those whom religion deems them worthy. No to Gay Marriage – but yes to civil unions which provide equal benefits and protections under the law as those afforded by “married people”.
Social Security:
Tax Cuts:
Whew! That was tiring. It’s a lot to digest all at once; but one thing’s for sure. I know a lot more now about it all than I did before I started this post. Feel free to comment. As I said before, I welcome intelligent disputes and opinions.
I love this video… and this has to be my favorite song of her’s by far… my favorite part of the vid is about 4/5 of the way in…